The agency sends a report every month, and nobody can tell whether it works. How we would run four channels against one number that shows up on the P&L.
For
Companies spending on marketing they cannot yet defend
Practice
Marketing & Brand
Starts with
Diagnose
Measured by
Return on spend, and conversations by channel
What it should change.
Every campaign has a target before it launches and a result after. Spend moves toward what returns and away from what does not, and the monthly report is one page with the numbers on it.
01The problem
The report is full of impressions, reach, and clicks. None of those is a question leadership asked. The question is what came back for what was spent, and the report does not say.
Impressions, not results
Spend that continues because it always has
No way to compare one channel with another
02What we would look at first
A year of spend by channel, set beside the inquiries and orders it produced. Where the tracking cannot connect the two, that is the first thing to fix, before a dollar moves.
03What we would build
A board of every campaign in flight: what it is for, what it costs, and what it has returned. Search, email, social, and the brand work sit beside each other, counted the same way. The ad accounts, the analytics, and the domain stay in your name.
A revenue target before launch
Small tests before spend is scaled
One definition of a conversation, used everywhere
04How it runs afterwards
A plain-English report every month: what we ran, what it returned, what we stopped, and what we would try next. We say so when something is not working.
Where it goes wrong
The part that usually goes wrong.
Every engagement has a part that fights back. This is the one we would plan for first.
Attribution that claims too much. Every channel will happily take credit for the same order. We would rather report a smaller number we can defend than a larger one we cannot, and we would say which is which.